8/29/2025: The AI Reality Check: What GTM Leaders Must Know

Aug 29, 2025

As per usual, excited to get you the goods this week! Not as many momentous AI model changes or updates (very weird) but a TON of research, articles and other info that is well worth your time.

I also partnered up with Zapier, giving a resource guide on AI Agents on Linkedin, comment to get the AI Agent Builders Guide from me!

This is sponsored by the GTM AI Academy and the AI Business Network.
Lets get into the podcast:

You can go to Youtube, Apple, Spotify as well as a whole other host of locations to hear the podcast or see the video interview.

The Velocity Imperative: Tim Sanders' Blueprint for AI-Driven GTM Success

Insights from G2's VP of Research on Why Speed Isn't Enough and Trust Gaps Are Killing GTM Performance

Overview

Tim Sanders, VP of Research Insights at G2, reveals a fundamental shift in how GTM leaders must approach AI implementation. Drawing from his unique perspective as a current AI research leader, Sanders argues that the primary barrier to GTM success isn't resource constraints, it's AI resistance masquerading as a trust gap. His analysis suggests that companies lose $44 billion annually due to cloud computing trust gaps alone, with AI representing a 5-10x higher opportunity cost.

Core Strategic Insights:

The Prediction Problem: Most GTM bottlenecks attributed to "people and bandwidth" are actually AI resistance issues
The Trust-Experience Correlation: 90 days of natural AI workflow integration eliminates executive resistance
The Search Evolution: 30% of B2B software buyer research now occurs through generative AI search engines
The Velocity vs. Speed Distinction: Effectiveness matters more than productivity in time-compressed markets

Part I: The Trust Gap Crisis - Why $44 Billion Is Just the Beginning

Sanders presents compelling research on the economic impact of technology resistance, using cloud computing as a cautionary tale for AI adoption.

"The average loss, they call it dead waste, that US companies alone experience because of this trust gap, because of cloud, $44 billion every year on average between 2006 and last year." [10:00]

The Exponential Cost of AI Resistance

Sanders' analysis reveals a pattern: the trust gap for AI "is gonna be probably five to 10x higher" than cloud computing losses. This projection suggests potential annual losses of $220-440 billion for companies that fail to overcome AI resistance.

Key Research Findings:

Cloud computing trust gap cost US companies $44 billion annually (2006-2023)
AI trust gap projected at 5-10x higher economic impact
Trust correlates directly with usage experience - the "training wheels effect"

"I could take an executive in GTM who says, 'I don't use any of these generative AI tools and I don't trust them in my workflows'... If they used it in their natural workflow for 90 days, they would recant this immediately and at least start an aggressive set of pilots. I guarantee it." [12:00]

The Endowment Bias Problem

Sanders references Jonathan Berger's research on change resistance, identifying "endowment to the status quo" as a primary barrier. This psychological principle explains why GTM leaders maintain expensive, inefficient processes rather than adopting AI solutions that demonstrably improve outcomes.

Part II: The Velocity Revolution - Beyond Speed to Strategic Impact

Redefining Productivity in GTM Context

Sanders makes a critical distinction between speed and velocity that reshapes how leaders should evaluate AI implementation:

"There is a massive difference between speed and velocity... Velocity is heading in the right direction, expeditiously with force and impact." [06:00]

The London Cab Paradigm: Sanders uses London's transportation transformation as a metaphor for GTM evolution. Traditional London cabs required 3-4 years of training ("the knowledge"), creating artificial scarcity. Uber's prediction-based approach eliminated this bottleneck, increasing driver availability by 10x.

"It turned out that it was always a prediction problem... Whatever it is you're trying to do in GTM, if you're just not delivering on your metrics, I challenge you to reconsider that your bottleneck is not people and bandwidth. Your bottleneck is artificial intelligence resistance or reluctance." [08:00]

The Market Timing Imperative

Sanders provides quantitative evidence for velocity over speed:

"If you're six months late on a GTM product launch in SaaS... you lose 30% of the profitability over the life of the product." [29:00]

This research underscores why effectiveness (showing up prepared for market windows) matters more than productivity (working faster on potentially irrelevant tasks).

Part III: The Search Engine Revolution - From SEO to GEO

The 30% Migration Reality

While industry reports suggest minimal AI search adoption (2-3%), Sanders argues that B2B software buyers represent a fundamentally different demographic:

"I believe that right now about 30% of search volume that's being done in relationship to researching and buying a product, connecting with marketing content is going on through Gen AI search." [17:00]

Supporting Evidence:

G2's buyer behavior report: 1/3 of buyers cite search as their biggest bottleneck
Accenture study: 30% productivity improvement with AI search
University of Hong Kong research: 158% productivity increase on deadline tasks

The Answer Engine Transformation

Sanders identifies a fundamental shift from search engines to answer engines:

"There's a big difference between search and answer... Answer engines are leveraging natural language processing and inferencing, and now reasoning to give you the best answer using brute force... The goal of the machine is a zero click search." [19:00]

Strategic Implications for CMOs:

Immediate action: Reallocate 10% of SEO/SEM budget to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
Medium-term: Scale to 30% budget allocation for GEO initiatives
Focus on owned audience development and user-generated content
Optimize content for answer attribution rather than click-through

Part IV: The Creative Paradigm Shift - From Nile Rodgers to Rick Rubin

The New Creative Economy

Sanders introduces the "Rick Rubin economy" concept, referencing the legendary producer who created 30+ platinum albums without playing instruments or understanding mixing boards:

"Artificial intelligence for the first time is decoupled prediction from judgment, so the machine can make the prediction and human beings own the judgment. That ability for you to know what good looks or sounds like and your confidence to put it into production instead of fiddling with it and losing valuable time will give you all the velocity." [28:00]

The Creative Hierarchy Shift:

Old model: Technical execution skills determined creative output quality
New model: Taste, judgment, and confidence drive creative success
AI handles prediction and generation; humans provide editorial judgment

Moving Beyond "Faster, Better, Cheaper"

Sanders advocates for fundamental process reimagination rather than efficiency optimization:

"The difference between the two is that in the old way, the machines helped you do things more efficiently and in the new way the machines help you do something you would've never been able to do before." [26:00]

Part V: Timestamped Strategic Insights and Implementation Framework

[00:01:00] - The Career Trajectory Insight

Sanders' background with Mark Cuban and early Google adoption provides credibility for his "query master" philosophy - never ask prospects questions answerable online. This principle extends to AI: never manually complete tasks that AI can handle better.

[00:05:00] - The Nuclear Cannon Analogy

A company employee's gaming metaphor illuminates AI's transformative potential: moving from pistol (manual work) to machine gun (efficiency tools) to nuclear cannon (AI capabilities that handle entire armies of tasks).

[00:09:00] - The Experience-Trust Correlation

Research correlation between AI experience and trust levels validates Sanders' 90-day integration thesis. Technical concerns decrease while strategic considerations increase with usage.

[00:14:00] - The Marketing Paradox

Washington State University research reveals consumer preference decreases when products are marketed as "AI-enabled." Sanders suggests focusing on transformative benefits rather than AI features - the Steve Jobs approach.

[00:21:00] - The Attribution Strategy

Long-form, question-answering content optimized for AI attribution becomes critical. YouTube transcript conversion to blog content represents immediate tactical opportunity.

[00:24:00] - The Service-Selling Distinction

Content strategy must shift from selling products to helping buyers make informed decisions. AI search rewards helpful content over promotional material.

Conclusion: The Velocity Imperative

Sanders' analysis reveals that GTM success increasingly depends on overcoming AI resistance rather than solving resource constraints. The companies that recognize AI adoption as a prediction problem rather than a technology problem will capture disproportionate market advantages through velocity improvements.

The transition from search engines to answer engines represents the most significant shift in content marketing since Google's launch. CMOs who reallocate budgets now will avoid the "Yellow Pages in 2010" scenario Sanders warns against.

Most critically, the shift from speed to velocity - from productivity to effectiveness - requires fundamental rethinking of GTM processes rather than optimization of existing workflows. The Rick Rubin economy rewards judgment and taste over technical execution, making creative leadership more valuable than operational efficiency.

The 30% profitability loss from six-month GTM delays makes velocity not just advantageous but existential for competitive success in compressed market windows.

About Tim Sanders

Tim Sanders serves as VP of Research Insights at G2, bringing decades of experience from his breakthrough role with Mark Cuban at AudioNet/broadcast.com to his current focus on AI-driven GTM transformation. Author of multiple books including "Love is the Killer App," Sanders combines deep research expertise with practical implementation experience across technology adoption cycles. His unique perspective spans the dot-com era through the current AI revolution, providing historical context for understanding technological transformation patterns.

Connect with Tim Sanders: LinkedIn: Tim Sanders, G2

The AI Reality Check: What GTM Leaders Must Know for 2025

A Data-Driven Analysis for Go-To-Market Professionals created from 18 research papers and articles that have been released over the last week.

Executive Summary

The AI landscape is experiencing a profound reality check. While $375 billion globally will be invested in AI infrastructure in 2025, a stark 95% failure rate in enterprise AI pilots reveals the critical gap between hype and execution. For GTM leaders, this presents both unprecedented opportunities and significant risks as market dynamics shift dramatically.

Key Statistical Indicators:

Companies will spend $375 billion globally on new data centers this year
95% of companies in the dataset, generative AI implementation is falling short
Over 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled by the end of 2027
68% are already using AI at work, and more than half (51%) are using AI agents

Part I: The Infrastructure Gold Rush Driving Market Transformation

The Data Center Economy Explosion

Investment in software and computer equipment, not counting the data center buildings, accounted for a quarter of all economic growth this past quarter. This unprecedented infrastructure spending is fundamentally reshaping business economics across sectors.

Critical Infrastructure Metrics:

AI data center power demand could grow more than thirtyfold, reaching 123 gigawatts, up from 4 gigawatts in 2024
87% expect the biggest short-term spikes to come from emerging AI cloud providers and 78% from edge computing platforms
In 2025, spending on data center construction — not including the cost of all the technology they house — will exceed investment in traditional office buildings

Strategic Implications for GTM Leaders:

Supply Chain Disruption: Traditional procurement cycles are being disrupted by AI infrastructure demands
Cost Structure Evolution: 55% say they plan to incrementally move workloads from the cloud once their data-hosting and computing costs hit a certain threshold
Geographic Market Shifts: Infrastructure development is decentralizing, creating new regional opportunities

Part II: The AI Implementation Reality - What's Working and What Isn't

The MIT Reality Check: 95% Failure Rate

The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025, a new report published by MIT's NANDA initiative, reveals that while generative AI holds promise for enterprises, most initiatives to drive rapid revenue growth are falling flat.

Critical Success Factors Identified:

Purchasing AI tools from specialized vendors and building partnerships succeed about 67% of the time, while internal builds succeed only one-third as often
Startups led by 19- or 20-year-olds, for example, "have seen revenues jump from zero to $20 million in a year"
Model collapse is a degenerative process affecting generations of learned generative models, in which the data they generate end up polluting the training set of the next generation

The Agentic AI Paradox

Most agentic AI projects right now are early stage experiments or proof of concepts that are mostly driven by hype and are often misapplied, yet at least 15% of day-to-day work decisions will be made autonomously through agentic AI by 2028, up from 0% in 2024.

Market Dynamics:

Out of thousands of vendors claiming agentic AI, Gartner believes only about 130 offer genuine solutions today
25% of enterprises using GenAI are forecast to deploy AI agents in 2025, growing to 50% by 2027

Part III: Workforce Transformation and Skills Gap Crisis

The Human-AI Collaboration Imperative

To better understand how organizations could use AI to augment the changing shape of the workforce, Deloitte surveyed more than 11,000 workers across 17 countries, revealing critical insights for GTM strategies.

Workforce Demographics Shift:

By 2030, 1 in 6 people globally will be over the age of 60
By 2030, one projection estimates that two-thirds of new entrants to the workforce will reside in Sub-Saharan Africa
67% of respondents over the age of 65, in our survey, say they prefer working with both AI and human co-workers

The Training Gap Crisis

Only 17% have received comprehensive, job-specific AI training. The rest are learning on their own, working with generic training, or perhaps most concerning, operating without any formal training at all.

Critical Training Insights:

Nearly half of marketing and sales professionals (48%) admit to using tools that aren't approved by their organization
While 65% feel confident in their ability to use AI in their role, more than a third (the remaining 35%) are only somewhat confident, or not confident at all

Part IV: Industry-Specific Patterns and Sector Analysis

Technology Sector Leadership

The technology is having a material impact on two out of nine industrial sectors – Technology and Media & Telecom.

Financial Services Challenges

Financial services face unique implementation challenges, with many firms building their own proprietary generative AI systems in 2025. Yet, MIT's research suggests companies see far more failures when going solo.

Manufacturing and Operations Excellence

Our latest study finds a 3.8x performance gap. The data for the new study comes from a detailed survey of how more than 100 companies have implemented AI in their operations over the last two years.

Operations Success Factors:

Payback periods had shrunk to six to 12 months for both groups
Strategic partnership management
Integration of data science with operational requirements

Part V: Conversational AI Market Dynamics

Platform Consolidation Trends

Gartner has dropped its first Magic Quadrant study into the Conversational AI space in over two years. The report, previously known as the "Gartner Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Conversational AI Platforms", looks very different this time around.

Market Reshuffling Indicators:

Many vendors have dropped off. These include OneReach.ai (a former Leader), AWS (a former Challenger), and Openstream.ai (a former Visionary)
DRUID AI sprints into the Challenger quadrant. LivePerson and PolyAI enter the mix as Niche Players

Strategic Implications: The significant vendor consolidation indicates market maturation and the emergence of clearer differentiation criteria, requiring GTM teams to reassess vendor relationships and platform strategies.

Part VI: Actionable Strategic Framework for GTM Leaders

Immediate Actions (Next 90 Days)

Infrastructure Assessment
- Evaluate current cloud computing cost trajectories
- 30% of respondents say they won't consider moving workloads off the cloud until cloud costs reach 1.5 times what they'd pay for an alternative
Vendor Partnership Strategy
- Prioritize partnerships over internal builds based on MIT research
- Focus on vendors with proven enterprise integration capabilities
Skills Gap Intervention
- Implement role-specific AI training programs
- Marketing and sales professionals want: Self-paced online modules with industry-specific examples (58%)

Medium-term Strategic Initiatives (3-12 Months)

Workforce Evolution Planning
- Organizations can leverage AI to accelerate skill development for early-career workers. Sixty-one percent of respondents to our survey believe that AI can support upskilling opportunities for entry-level workers
Technology Stack Optimization
- Rather than locking into one setup, infrastructure should allow models to be hosted and workloads to move based on context
Risk Management Framework
- Organizations must focus on enterprise productivity, rather than just individual task augmentation

Long-term Competitive Positioning (1-3 Years)

Market Leadership through AI Excellence
- As the performance gap widens, some firms will be left behind in the race to apply AI, ML, and data to operations
Ecosystem Development
- Build strategic partnerships with infrastructure providers
- Develop proprietary data advantages
Regulatory Preparedness
- The new US federal AI policy demands that government and private-sector tech leaders embrace responsible and explainable AI

Conclusion: The Decisive Moment

The convergence of massive infrastructure investment, widespread implementation failures, and emerging technological capabilities creates a unique inflection point. GTM leaders who act decisively on these insights will capture disproportionate market advantages, while those who hesitate risk permanent competitive disadvantage.

The data clearly shows that success in AI implementation requires strategic partnerships, role-specific training, and operational excellence rather than purely technological investment. The organizations that bridge the "GenAI Divide" will emerge as the market leaders of the next decade.

References and Source Articles

GTM AI Podcast & Newsletter

Discussion about this post